Home News 3 Stories You Should Read 9/12/2019: Water Protection Rule, Trump 2020, John Roberts

3 Stories You Should Read 9/12/2019: Water Protection Rule, Trump 2020, John Roberts

by Confluence
Reading Time: 2 minutes

Confluence Daily is your daily news source for women in the know.

In the category of:  Who needs clean water anyway?

Trump Administration To Revoke Obama-Era Water Protection Rule

Environmentalists say the move would leave millions of Americans with less safe drinking water and damage wetlands that prevent flooding.

TRAVERSE CITY, Mich. (AP) — The Trump administration plans to revoke an Obama-era regulation that provided federal protection to many U.S. wetlands and streams, according to two Environmental Protection Agency officials with knowledge of the plan.

The rule defined which waterways are subject to federal regulation. The administration plans to replace it with its own version, according to the officials, who were not authorized to speak publicly about the decision and spoke on the condition of anonymity.



In the category of:  Don’t get too comfortable

What Trump’s horrific polling actually tells us — and what it doesn’t — about 2020

Trump keeps polling really badly against all the major 2020 Dems.

The polls du jour show President Donald Trump trailing basically every Democrat in the 2020 general election, both nationally and in individual states — even in Texas.

Democratic voters might rejoice at these signs that Trump will be a one-term president. But they should temper themselves: Hillary Clinton was regularly leading Trump by 10 points or more a year ahead of the 2016 election. Polls taken 14 months before an election are simply not predictive. Too much can happen and sentiments can change when the race becomes one specific Democrat running against one specific Republican.

We also shouldn’t read too much, pollsters and political handicappers say, into the variations in how different Democrats fare against Trump in these polls. Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders might enjoy the biggest margins simply because they have the highest name ID among the 2020 Democratic field. It doesn’t necessarily mean that they would wallop Trump whereas Kamala Harris or Pete Buttigieg would struggle. It might just mean fewer Americans have heard of them.




In the category of:  Unpredictable in a good way

Exclusive: How John Roberts killed the census citizenship question

Chief Justice John Roberts cast the deciding vote against President Donald Trump’s attempt to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census, but only after changing his position behind the scenes, sources familiar with the private Supreme Court deliberations tell CNN.

The case was fraught with political consequences. Democrats and civil rights advocates claimed the query would discourage responses to the decennial questionnaire from new immigrants and minorities and affect the balance of power nationwide.
Roberts’ action recalled his dramatic switch in the 2012 case that saved President Barack Obama’s Affordable Care Act. Once again, the chief, an appointee of President George W. Bush and a reliable conservative, had sided with the liberals as a dispute of immense national significance went down to the wire.

Confluence Daily is the one place where everything comes together. The one-stop for daily news for women.


Related Articles

Leave a Comment

Subscribe to get your Confluence Daily Digest delivered straight your inbox daily so you can be in the know without getting buried in the news