Confluence Daily is your daily news source for women in the know.
The Supreme Court has issued a number of rulings in recent months that have been seen as more liberal than expected, given the court’s current conservative makeup. Some observers believe that these rulings may be a sign that the court is aware of its legitimacy crisis and is trying to shore up public support.
One of the most notable recent rulings was the court’s decision in West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency, in which the court ruled that the EPA does not have broad authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from power plants. The decision was a major victory for the fossil fuel industry and was seen as a setback for environmental protection. However, it was also a surprise to many, as it was issued by a 6-3 conservative majority that includes three justices appointed by former President Donald Trump.
Another recent ruling that was seen as more liberal was the court’s decision in Bostock v. Clayton County, in which the court ruled that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects gay and transgender people from employment discrimination. The decision was a major victory for the LGBTQ community and was seen as a sign that the court was becoming more progressive on social issues.
The court’s recent rulings have been met with mixed reactions. Some have praised the court for its willingness to issue rulings that are in line with public opinion, while others have criticized the court for its perceived activism. The court’s legitimacy crisis is likely to continue to be a major issue in the years to come.
There are a number of reasons why the Supreme Court may be issuing more liberal rulings in recent months. One possibility is that the court is simply responding to public opinion. A recent poll found that a majority of Americans support abortion rights and gun control, two issues on which the court has issued conservative rulings in recent years. The court may be feeling pressure to issue rulings that are more in line with public opinion in order to maintain its legitimacy.
Another possibility is that the court is trying to avoid a constitutional crisis. The court’s decision in Roe v. Wade, which legalized abortion nationwide, is one of the most controversial rulings in its history. If the court were to overturn Roe v. Wade, it would likely lead to widespread protests and calls for court reform. By issuing more liberal rulings on other issues, the court may be trying to avoid a similar crisis.
Whatever the reason, the Supreme Court’s recent rulings suggest that the court is aware of its legitimacy crisis and is trying to address it. Whether these rulings will be enough to restore public trust in the court remains to be seen.